Discussion about this post

User's avatar
B Jones's avatar

I think you’ve hit on something key, Chrissy. Substack has become its own performative form of community, with a sanitized, reductive set of safe topics and cliched phrases that establish membership in that community of thought. This was done as a backlash to the rage-baiting and trolling of other platforms, which is understandable, but has become its form of ideological prison. Your writing is remarkable in that it refuses to conform to this orthodoxy and offers a form of expression that feels radically free and personal. I’m really looking forward to what you write in 2026.

Carsen Codel's avatar

If it’s any consolation, you are one of the strongest voices I read here in terms of having a unique perspective and tone, so, for the time being, I wouldn’t include your work in that great “homogenization.”

On another note, I think if every Substack essayist was forbidden from using words like “gentle,” “tender,” “ache,” “soft,” etc etc maybe that would help a little? Maybe we’re frustrated with different writers.

My central issue with how things are going is how all-or-nothing some of these essays can be; how a new album can be “the end of the American straight woman” or some random tweet signals “the downfall of the American community” fill in the blank as you must. Essays were never meant to be so all-encompassing. The best stay small, in a particular, and often peculiar moment, else there wouldn’t be something worth saying. And something can be worth saying if it doesn’t get tacked to something so huge. It’s a try, not a total remedy. Right?

177 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?